Balls of Fury vs Pulp Fiction
Pulp Fiction has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 5.3/10 for Balls of Fury). Balls of Fury is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 2h 34m. Pulp Fiction is the older of the two (1994 against 2007). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood. Both feature Christopher Walken.
Balls of Fury
Pulp Fiction| Balls of Fury | Pulp Fiction | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.3/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1994 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 2h 34m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | United States of America |
| Director | Robert Ben Garant | Quentin Tarantino |
| Main cast | Maggie Q, Aisha Tyler, Robert Patrick, Terry Crews, Christopher Walken | Samuel L. Jackson, Amanda Plummer, Christopher Walken, Ving Rhames, Uma Thurman |
Synopsis
Balls of Fury
Randy Daytona was a child ping pong prodigy who lost his chance at Olympic gold when his father is murdered by the mysterious Feng over a gambling debt. 15yrs later he's down on his luck and scraping a living doing seedy back room shows in Vegas; when the FBI turn up and ask for his help to take down Feng... who just happens to love Ping Pong.
Pulp Fiction
A burger-loving hit man, his philosophical partner, a drug-addled gangster's moll and a washed-up boxer converge in this sprawling, comedic crime caper. Their adventures unfurl in three stories that ingeniously trip back and forth in time.
Where to watch
Where to watch Balls of FuryWhere to watch Pulp Fiction
More like Balls of Fury · More like Pulp Fiction · Compare other titles