Balls of Fury vs The Big Lebowski
The Big Lebowski has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 5.3/10 for Balls of Fury). Balls of Fury is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 57m. The Big Lebowski is the older of the two (1998 against 2007). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Balls of Fury
The Big Lebowski| Balls of Fury | The Big Lebowski | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.3/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1998 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 57m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Robert Ben Garant | Joel Coen |
| Main cast | Maggie Q, Aisha Tyler, Robert Patrick, Terry Crews, Christopher Walken | Steve Buscemi, Jeff Bridges, Peter Stormare, John Turturro, John Goodman |
Synopsis
Balls of Fury
Randy Daytona was a child ping pong prodigy who lost his chance at Olympic gold when his father is murdered by the mysterious Feng over a gambling debt. 15yrs later he's down on his luck and scraping a living doing seedy back room shows in Vegas; when the FBI turn up and ask for his help to take down Feng... who just happens to love Ping Pong.
The Big Lebowski
Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski, a Los Angeles slacker who only wants to bowl and drink White Russians, is mistaken for another Jeffrey Lebowski, a wheelchair-bound millionaire, and finds himself dragged into a strange series of events involving nihilists, adult film producers, ferrets, errant toes, and large sums of money.
Where to watch
Where to watch Balls of FuryWhere to watch The Big Lebowski
More like Balls of Fury · More like The Big Lebowski · Compare other titles