Balls of Fury vs The Wolf of Wall Street
The Wolf of Wall Street has the higher audience score (8/10 against 5.3/10 for Balls of Fury). Balls of Fury is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 3h . Balls of Fury is the older of the two (2007 against 2013). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Balls of Fury
The Wolf of Wall Street| Balls of Fury | The Wolf of Wall Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.3/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 3h |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Robert Ben Garant | Martin Scorsese |
| Main cast | Maggie Q, Aisha Tyler, Robert Patrick, Terry Crews, Christopher Walken | Jon Bernthal, Shea Whigham, Joanna Lumley, Cristin Milioti, Jon Favreau |
Synopsis
Balls of Fury
Randy Daytona was a child ping pong prodigy who lost his chance at Olympic gold when his father is murdered by the mysterious Feng over a gambling debt. 15yrs later he's down on his luck and scraping a living doing seedy back room shows in Vegas; when the FBI turn up and ask for his help to take down Feng... who just happens to love Ping Pong.
The Wolf of Wall Street
A New York stockbroker refuses to cooperate in a large securities fraud case involving corruption on Wall Street, corporate banking world and mob infiltration. Based on Jordan Belfort's autobiography.
Where to watch
Where to watch Balls of FuryWhere to watch The Wolf of Wall Street
More like Balls of Fury · More like The Wolf of Wall Street · Compare other titles