Beaconsfield vs Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.8/10 for Beaconsfield). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 51m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2012). Both are drama, tv movie movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Beaconsfield
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars| Beaconsfield | Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 51m | 1h 2m |
| Genres | Drama, TV Movie | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Glendyn Ivin | Graeme Harper |
| Main cast | Simon Lyndon, Angus Sampson, Lachy Hulme, Shane Jacobson, Cameron Daddo | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster |
Synopsis
Beaconsfield
On Anzac Day 2006 the Beaconsfield mine collapsed, trapping Russell, Webb and fellow miner Larry Knight one kilometre underground. When it was revealed that two of the men were alive, Australia prayed and the world waited in hope that the miners would make it out alive. But the rescue was far more complex than anyone ever imagined. Beaconsfield recounts this riveting story of mental and physical fortitude and two very different men who were…
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Where to watch
Where to watch BeaconsfieldWhere to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
More like Beaconsfield · More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · Compare other titles