Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts vs Trace of Stones
Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts has the higher audience score (10/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts is the shorter watch at 1h 50m compared with 2h 19m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 2025). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts
Trace of Stones| Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts | Trace of Stones | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 1966 |
| Length | 1h 50m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Romance |
| Country | Sri Lanka | – |
| Director | Shaun Seneviratne | Frank Beyer |
| Main cast | Sathya Sridharan, Anastasia Olowin | Hans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke |
Synopsis
Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts
A couple in a long-distance relationship reunite for a road trip through Sri Lanka. Things go awry.
Trace of Stones
Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…
Where to watch
Where to watch Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 PartsWhere to watch Trace of Stones
More like Ben and Suzanne, A Reunion in 4 Parts · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles