Big Bad Wolves vs The Hands of Orlac
Big Bad Wolves has the higher audience score (6.6/10 against 4.4/10 for The Hands of Orlac). The Hands of Orlac is the shorter watch at 1h 35m compared with 1h 46m. The Hands of Orlac is the older of the two (1960 against 2013). Both are crime, horror, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Big Bad Wolves
The Hands of Orlac| Big Bad Wolves | The Hands of Orlac | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.6/10 | ★ 4.4/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 1960 |
| Length | 1h 46m | 1h 35m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Horror, Thriller | Crime, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Aharon Keshales, Navot Papushado | Edmond T. Gréville |
| Main cast | Qais Nashif, Lior Ashkenazi, Tzahi Grad, Rotem Keinan, Doval'e Glickman | Christopher Lee, Donald Pleasence, Mel Ferrer, Felix Aylmer, Dany Carrel |
Synopsis
Big Bad Wolves
Tel Aviv, Israel. The twisted paths of three very different men brutally collide due to a chain of unspeakable murders: a grieving father who has been doomed to seek vengeance and a police detective who boldly crosses the narrow boundary between law and crime meet a religion teacher suspected of being the murderer.
The Hands of Orlac
A famed concert pianist's hands are destroyed in a plane crash; when he receives transplants from a recently executed strangler, his murderous new mitts attract the attention of a sleazy illusionist turned blackmailer.
Where to watch
Where to watch Big Bad WolvesWhere to watch The Hands of Orlac
More like Big Bad Wolves · More like The Hands of Orlac · Compare other titles