Big Fish vs No Game, No Life: Zero
Big Fish and No Game, No Life: Zero are tied on audience score (7.8/10). No Game, No Life: Zero is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 2h 5m. Big Fish is the older of the two (2003 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Big Fish
No Game, No Life: Zero| Big Fish | No Game, No Life: Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2017 |
| Length | 2h 5m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy | Adventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tim Burton | Atsuko Ishizuka |
| Main cast | Steve Buscemi, Missi Pyle, Ewan McGregor, David Denman, Albert Finney | Yuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie Kugimiya |
Synopsis
Big Fish
Throughout his life Edward Bloom has always been a man of big appetites, enormous passions and tall tales. In his later years, he remains a huge mystery to his son, William. Now, to get to know the real man, Will begins piecing together a true picture of his father from flashbacks of his amazing adventures.
No Game, No Life: Zero
Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…
Where to watch
Where to watch Big FishWhere to watch No Game, No Life: Zero
More like Big Fish · More like No Game, No Life: Zero · Compare other titles