Big Fish vs Where the Wild Things Are
Big Fish has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.5/10 for Where the Wild Things Are). Where the Wild Things Are is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 2h 5m. Big Fish is the older of the two (2003 against 2009). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Big Fish
Where the Wild Things Are| Big Fish | Where the Wild Things Are | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2009 |
| Length | 2h 5m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Tim Burton | Spike Jonze |
| Main cast | Steve Buscemi, Missi Pyle, Ewan McGregor, David Denman, Albert Finney | Paul Dano, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Catherine O'Hara |
Synopsis
Big Fish
Throughout his life Edward Bloom has always been a man of big appetites, enormous passions and tall tales. In his later years, he remains a huge mystery to his son, William. Now, to get to know the real man, Will begins piecing together a true picture of his father from flashbacks of his amazing adventures.
Where the Wild Things Are
Max imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off land where large talking beasts—Ira, Carol, Douglas, the Bull, Judith and Alexander—crown him as their king, play rumpus, build forts and discover secret hideaways.
Where to watch
Where to watch Big FishWhere to watch Where the Wild Things Are
More like Big Fish · More like Where the Wild Things Are · Compare other titles