Bizarrofilia vs How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee
How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee is the shorter watch at 4m compared with 1h 24m. Bizarrofilia is the older of the two (2024 against 2026). Both are documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Bizarrofilia | How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 0.0/10 |
| Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Length | 1h 24m | 4m |
| Genres | Documentary | Documentary |
| Country | Argentina | Sweden |
| Director | Ayi Turzi | Adam Huttune, Oscar Jakobsson |
| Main cast | Darío Lavia, Tetsuo Lumière, Daniela Giménez, Valeria Arévalos, Ariel Sotomayor | Gianni Infantino, Donald Trump, Jonas Eriksson, Wilton Sampaio, Iván Barton |
Synopsis
Bizarrofilia
Argentina is a country with an extensive and varied cinematography. Within this enormity, there is a rare, atypical… bizarre cinema. Bizarrofilia aims to investigate the origin and meaning of the word “bizarre”, how the passage of time implies reinterpretations of some works, and focuses on the contemporary production of films that aim to distance themselves from any mimetic representation of reality… although in a country like ours reality…
How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee
See how the process works and who Jonas Eriksson thinks will get the chance to referee the 2026 World Cup final.
Where to watch
Where to watch BizarrofiliaWhere to watch How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee
More like Bizarrofilia · More like How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee · Compare other titles
Bizarrofilia
How FIFA Chooses the World Cup Final Referee