Bizarrofilia vs Lost in La Mancha
Bizarrofilia has the higher audience score (10/10 against 7.1/10 for Lost in La Mancha). Bizarrofilia is the shorter watch at 1h 24m compared with 1h 33m. Lost in La Mancha is the older of the two (2002 against 2024). Both are documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Bizarrofilia
Lost in La Mancha| Bizarrofilia | Lost in La Mancha | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2024 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 24m | 1h 33m |
| Genres | Documentary | Documentary |
| Country | Argentina | United Kingdom |
| Director | Ayi Turzi | Keith Fulton, Louis Pepe |
| Main cast | Darío Lavia, Tetsuo Lumière, Daniela Giménez, Valeria Arévalos, Ariel Sotomayor | Jeff Bridges, Johnny Depp, Jean Rochefort, Vanessa Paradis, Terry Gilliam |
Synopsis
Bizarrofilia
Argentina is a country with an extensive and varied cinematography. Within this enormity, there is a rare, atypical… bizarre cinema. Bizarrofilia aims to investigate the origin and meaning of the word “bizarre”, how the passage of time implies reinterpretations of some works, and focuses on the contemporary production of films that aim to distance themselves from any mimetic representation of reality… although in a country like ours reality…
Lost in La Mancha
Fulton and Pepe's 2000 documentary captures Terry Gilliam's attempt to get The Man Who Killed Don Quixote off the ground. Back injuries, freakish storms, and more zoom in to sabotage the project.
Where to watch
Where to watch BizarrofiliaWhere to watch Lost in La Mancha
More like Bizarrofilia · More like Lost in La Mancha · Compare other titles