Bizarrofilia vs Notes for a Film in India
Bizarrofilia has the higher audience score (10/10 against 6.2/10 for Notes for a Film in India). Notes for a Film in India is the shorter watch at 25m compared with 1h 24m. Notes for a Film in India is the older of the two (1968 against 2024). Both are documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Bizarrofilia
Notes for a Film in India| Bizarrofilia | Notes for a Film in India | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 10.0/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 2024 | 1968 |
| Length | 1h 24m | 25m |
| Genres | Documentary | Documentary |
| Country | Argentina | – |
| Director | Ayi Turzi | Pier Paolo Pasolini |
| Main cast | Darío Lavia, Tetsuo Lumière, Daniela Giménez, Valeria Arévalos, Ariel Sotomayor | Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, Rajinder Singh Bedi, Pier Paolo Pasolini |
Synopsis
Bizarrofilia
Argentina is a country with an extensive and varied cinematography. Within this enormity, there is a rare, atypical… bizarre cinema. Bizarrofilia aims to investigate the origin and meaning of the word “bizarre”, how the passage of time implies reinterpretations of some works, and focuses on the contemporary production of films that aim to distance themselves from any mimetic representation of reality… although in a country like ours reality…
Notes for a Film in India
A 1968 short documentary film by Pier Paolo Pasolini where he visits India in the search of a king who could give up his body to feed a starving tiger.
Where to watch
Where to watch BizarrofiliaWhere to watch Notes for a Film in India
More like Bizarrofilia · More like Notes for a Film in India · Compare other titles