Blood and Bone vs Hackers
Blood and Bone has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.4/10 for Hackers). Blood and Bone is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 47m. Hackers is the older of the two (1995 against 2009). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Blood and Bone | Hackers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 1h 47m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ben Ramsey | Iain Softley |
| Main cast | Dante Basco, Dick Anthony Williams, Eamonn Walker, Ron Yuan, Julian Sands | Jesse Bradford, Wendell Pierce, Jonny Lee Miller, Angelina Jolie, Penn Jillette |
Synopsis
Blood and Bone
In Los Angeles, an ex-con takes the underground fighting world by storm in his quest to fulfill a promise to a dead friend.
Hackers
Along with his new friends, a teenager who was arrested by the US Secret Service and banned from using a computer for writing a computer virus discovers a plot by a nefarious hacker, but they must use their computer skills to find the evidence while being pursued by the Secret Service and the evil computer genius behind the virus.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and BoneWhere to watch Hackers
More like Blood and Bone · More like Hackers · Compare other titles
Blood and Bone
Hackers