Blood and Bone vs Harsh Times
Blood and Bone has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.4/10 for Harsh Times). Blood and Bone is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 56m. Harsh Times is the older of the two (2005 against 2009). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Bone
Harsh Times| Blood and Bone | Harsh Times | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2005 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 1h 56m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ben Ramsey | David Ayer |
| Main cast | Dante Basco, Dick Anthony Williams, Eamonn Walker, Ron Yuan, Julian Sands | Terry Crews, Emilio Rivera, Eva Longoria, Christian Bale, J.K. Simmons |
Synopsis
Blood and Bone
In Los Angeles, an ex-con takes the underground fighting world by storm in his quest to fulfill a promise to a dead friend.
Harsh Times
Jim Davis is an ex-Army Ranger who finds himself slipping back into his old life of petty crime after a job offer from the LAPD evaporates. His best friend is pressured by his girlfriend Sylvia to find a job, but Jim is more interested in hanging out and making cash from small heists, while trying to get a law enforcement job so he can marry his Mexican girlfriend.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and BoneWhere to watch Harsh Times
More like Blood and Bone · More like Harsh Times · Compare other titles