Blood and Bone vs Jack Reacher
Blood and Bone has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.6/10 for Jack Reacher). Blood and Bone is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 2h 10m. Blood and Bone is the older of the two (2009 against 2012). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Bone
Jack Reacher| Blood and Bone | Jack Reacher | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 2h 10m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Ben Ramsey | Christopher McQuarrie |
| Main cast | Dante Basco, Dick Anthony Williams, Eamonn Walker, Ron Yuan, Julian Sands | Joseph Sikora, Richard Jenkins, Michael Raymond-James, Jai Courtney, Rosamund Pike |
Synopsis
Blood and Bone
In Los Angeles, an ex-con takes the underground fighting world by storm in his quest to fulfill a promise to a dead friend.
Jack Reacher
One morning in an ordinary town, five people are shot dead in a seemingly random attack. All evidence points to a single suspect: an ex-military sniper who is quickly brought into custody. The interrogation yields one written note: 'Get Jack Reacher!'. Reacher, an enigmatic ex-Army investigator, believes the authorities have the right man but agrees to help the sniper's defense attorney. However, the more Reacher delves into the case, the less…
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and BoneWhere to watch Jack Reacher
More like Blood and Bone · More like Jack Reacher · Compare other titles