Blood and Bone vs Takers
Blood and Bone has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.2/10 for Takers). Blood and Bone is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 47m. Blood and Bone is the older of the two (2009 against 2010). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Bone
Takers| Blood and Bone | Takers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 1h 47m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ben Ramsey | John Luessenhop |
| Main cast | Dante Basco, Dick Anthony Williams, Eamonn Walker, Ron Yuan, Julian Sands | Idris Elba, Jay Hernandez, Gaius Charles, Glynn Turman, Marianne Jean-Baptiste |
Synopsis
Blood and Bone
In Los Angeles, an ex-con takes the underground fighting world by storm in his quest to fulfill a promise to a dead friend.
Takers
A seasoned team of bank robbers, including Gordon Jennings, John Rahway, A.J., and brothers Jake and Jesse Attica successfully complete their latest heist and lead a life of luxury while planning their next job. When Ghost, a former member of their team, is released from prison he convinces the group to strike an armored car carrying $20 million. As the "Takers" carefully plot out their strategy and draw nearer to exacting the grand heist, a…
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and BoneWhere to watch Takers
More like Blood and Bone · More like Takers · Compare other titles