Blood and Bone vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Blood and Bone and Undisputed III: Redemption are tied on audience score (7.4/10). Blood and Bone is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 36m. Blood and Bone is the older of the two (2009 against 2010). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Bone
Undisputed III: Redemption| Blood and Bone | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Ben Ramsey | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Dante Basco, Dick Anthony Williams, Eamonn Walker, Ron Yuan, Julian Sands | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Blood and Bone
In Los Angeles, an ex-con takes the underground fighting world by storm in his quest to fulfill a promise to a dead friend.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and BoneWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Blood and Bone · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles