Blood and Chocolate vs Bones and All
Bones and All has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.6/10 for Blood and Chocolate). Blood and Chocolate is the shorter watch at 1h 38m compared with 2h 11m. Blood and Chocolate is the older of the two (2007 against 2022). Both are drama, horror, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Chocolate
Bones and All| Blood and Chocolate | Bones and All | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.6/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2022 |
| Length | 1h 38m | 2h 11m |
| Genres | Drama, Fantasy, Horror, Romance | Drama, Horror, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Katja von Garnier | Luca Guadagnino |
| Main cast | Hugh Dancy, Olivier Martinez, Chris Geere, Agnes Bruckner, Tom Harper | Taylor Russell, Michael Stuhlbarg, Chloë Sevigny, Mark Rylance, Timothée Chalamet |
Synopsis
Blood and Chocolate
A young teenage werewolf is torn between honoring her family's secret and her love for a man.
Bones and All
Abandoned by her father, a young woman embarks on a thousand-mile odyssey through the backroads of America where she meets a disenfranchised drifter. But despite their best efforts, all roads lead back to their terrifying pasts and to a final stand that will determine whether their love can survive their otherness.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and ChocolateWhere to watch Bones and All
More like Blood and Chocolate · More like Bones and All · Compare other titles