Blood and Chocolate vs Tale of Tales
Tale of Tales has the higher audience score (6.4/10 against 5.6/10 for Blood and Chocolate). Blood and Chocolate is the shorter watch at 1h 38m compared with 2h 14m. Blood and Chocolate is the older of the two (2007 against 2015). Both are fantasy, horror, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Chocolate
Tale of Tales| Blood and Chocolate | Tale of Tales | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.6/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2015 |
| Length | 1h 38m | 2h 14m |
| Genres | Drama, Fantasy, Horror, Romance | Fantasy, Horror, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Katja von Garnier | Matteo Garrone |
| Main cast | Hugh Dancy, Olivier Martinez, Chris Geere, Agnes Bruckner, Tom Harper | Vincent Cassel, Toby Jones, Shirley Henderson, Salma Hayek Pinault, Alba Rohrwacher |
Synopsis
Blood and Chocolate
A young teenage werewolf is torn between honoring her family's secret and her love for a man.
Tale of Tales
The Queen of Selvascura risks everything to be a mother; the King of Roccaforte falls in love with the voice of a mysterious girl; the King of Altomonte becomes obsessed with a flea and neglects his daughter.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and ChocolateWhere to watch Tale of Tales
More like Blood and Chocolate · More like Tale of Tales · Compare other titles