Blood and Diamonds vs Dobermann
Blood and Diamonds has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.5/10 for Dobermann). Blood and Diamonds is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 1h 43m. Blood and Diamonds is the older of the two (1964 against 1997). Both are action, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Blood and Diamonds | Dobermann | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 1964 | 1997 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 43m |
| Genres | Action, Crime | Action, Crime |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jun Fukuda | Jan Kounen |
| Main cast | 임진웅, Makoto Satō, Kumi Mizuno, Akira Takarada, Yū Fujiki | Vincent Cassel, Monica Bellucci, Tchéky Karyo, François Levantal, Florence Thomassin |
Synopsis
Blood and Diamonds
A group of criminals whose diamond heist goes wrong retreat to a WWII era bunker where tensions begin to rise.
Dobermann
The charismatic criminal Dobermann, who got his first gun when he was christened, leads a gang of brutal robbers. After a complex and brutal bank robbery, they are being hunted by the Paris police. The hunt is led by the sadistic cop Christini, who only has one goal: to catch Dobermann at any cost.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and DiamondsWhere to watch Dobermann
More like Blood and Diamonds · More like Dobermann · Compare other titles
Blood and Diamonds
Dobermann