Blood and Diamonds vs Parker
Blood and Diamonds has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.1/10 for Parker). Blood and Diamonds is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 1h 58m. Blood and Diamonds is the older of the two (1964 against 2013). Both are action, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Diamonds
Parker| Blood and Diamonds | Parker | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 1964 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 58m |
| Genres | Action, Crime | Action, Crime |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jun Fukuda | Taylor Hackford |
| Main cast | 임진웅, Makoto Satō, Kumi Mizuno, Akira Takarada, Yū Fujiki | Michael Chiklis, Patti LuPone, Wendell Pierce, Jason Statham, Jennifer Lopez |
Synopsis
Blood and Diamonds
A group of criminals whose diamond heist goes wrong retreat to a WWII era bunker where tensions begin to rise.
Parker
A thief with a unique code of professional ethics is double-crossed by his crew and left for dead. Assuming a new disguise and forming an unlikely alliance with a woman on the inside, he looks to hijack the score of the crew's latest heist.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and DiamondsWhere to watch Parker
More like Blood and Diamonds · More like Parker · Compare other titles