Blood and Diamonds vs Red Heat
Blood and Diamonds has the higher audience score (8/10 against 6.2/10 for Red Heat). Blood and Diamonds is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 1h 44m. Blood and Diamonds is the older of the two (1964 against 1988). Both are action, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood and Diamonds
Red Heat| Blood and Diamonds | Red Heat | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 1964 | 1988 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 44m |
| Genres | Action, Crime | Action, Crime |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jun Fukuda | Walter Hill |
| Main cast | 임진웅, Makoto Satō, Kumi Mizuno, Akira Takarada, Yū Fujiki | Laurence Fishburne, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jim Belushi, Gina Gershon |
Synopsis
Blood and Diamonds
A group of criminals whose diamond heist goes wrong retreat to a WWII era bunker where tensions begin to rise.
Red Heat
A tough Russian policeman is forced to partner up with a cocky Chicago police detective when he is sent to Chicago to apprehend a Georgian drug lord who killed his partner and fled the country.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and DiamondsWhere to watch Red Heat
More like Blood and Diamonds · More like Red Heat · Compare other titles