Blood and Diamonds vs The Dark Knight
The Dark Knight has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 8/10 for Blood and Diamonds). Blood and Diamonds is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 2h 32m. Blood and Diamonds is the older of the two (1964 against 2008). Both are action, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Blood and Diamonds | The Dark Knight | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 1964 | 2008 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 2h 32m |
| Genres | Action, Crime | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Jun Fukuda | Christopher Nolan |
| Main cast | 임진웅, Makoto Satō, Kumi Mizuno, Akira Takarada, Yū Fujiki | Nestor Carbonell, Aaron Eckhart, Monique Gabriela Curnen, Cillian Murphy, Anthony Michael Hall |
Synopsis
Blood and Diamonds
A group of criminals whose diamond heist goes wrong retreat to a WWII era bunker where tensions begin to rise.
The Dark Knight
Batman raises the stakes in his war on crime. With the help of Lt. Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent, Batman sets out to dismantle the remaining criminal organizations that plague the streets. The partnership proves to be effective, but they soon find themselves prey to a reign of chaos unleashed by a rising criminal mastermind known to the terrified citizens of Gotham as the Joker.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood and DiamondsWhere to watch The Dark Knight
More like Blood and Diamonds · More like The Dark Knight · Compare other titles
Blood and Diamonds
The Dark Knight