Blood Diamond vs Man on Fire
Blood Diamond and Man on Fire are tied on audience score (7.6/10). Blood Diamond is the shorter watch at 2h 23m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2006). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood Diamond
Man on Fire| Blood Diamond | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2004 |
| Length | 2h 23m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Edward Zwick | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Jennifer Connelly, David Harewood, Michael Sheen, Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, Djimon Hounsou | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Blood Diamond
An ex-mercenary turned smuggler. A Mende fisherman. Amid the explosive civil war overtaking 1999 Sierra Leone, these men join for two desperate missions: recovering a rare pink diamond of immense value and rescuing the fisherman's son, conscripted as a child soldier into the brutal rebel forces ripping a swath of torture and bloodshed countrywide.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood DiamondWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Blood Diamond · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles