Blood Diamond vs The Sum of All Fears
Blood Diamond has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 6.4/10 for The Sum of All Fears). The Sum of All Fears is the shorter watch at 2h 4m compared with 2h 23m. The Sum of All Fears is the older of the two (2002 against 2006). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood Diamond
The Sum of All Fears| Blood Diamond | The Sum of All Fears | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2002 |
| Length | 2h 23m | 2h 4m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Edward Zwick | Phil Alden Robinson |
| Main cast | Jennifer Connelly, David Harewood, Michael Sheen, Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, Djimon Hounsou | Ron Rifkin, Bridget Moynahan, Liev Schreiber, Colm Feore, Ben Affleck |
Synopsis
Blood Diamond
An ex-mercenary turned smuggler. A Mende fisherman. Amid the explosive civil war overtaking 1999 Sierra Leone, these men join for two desperate missions: recovering a rare pink diamond of immense value and rescuing the fisherman's son, conscripted as a child soldier into the brutal rebel forces ripping a swath of torture and bloodshed countrywide.
The Sum of All Fears
When the president of Russia suddenly dies, a man whose politics are virtually unknown succeeds him. The change in political leaders sparks paranoia among American CIA officials, so CIA director Bill Cabot recruits a young analyst to supply insight and advice on the situation. Then the unthinkable happens: a nuclear bomb explodes in a U.S. city, and America is quick to blame the Russians.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood DiamondWhere to watch The Sum of All Fears
More like Blood Diamond · More like The Sum of All Fears · Compare other titles