Blood Father vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.2/10 for Blood Father). Blood Father is the shorter watch at 1h 28m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2016). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blood Father
Man on Fire| Blood Father | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 28m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jean-François Richet | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Mel Gibson, William H. Macy, Erin Moriarty, Miguel Sandoval, Diego Luna | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Blood Father
An ex-con reunites with his estranged wayward 16-year old daughter to protect her from drug dealers who are trying to kill her.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood FatherWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Blood Father · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles