Blood Work vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.2/10 for Blood Work). Blood Work is the shorter watch at 1h 50m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2002). Both are action, crime, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood. Both feature Clint Eastwood.
| Blood Work | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 50m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Clint Eastwood | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Rick Hoffman, Dylan Walsh, Clint Eastwood, Gerry Becker, Paul Rodríguez | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
Blood Work
Still recovering from a heart transplant, a retired FBI profiler returns to service when his own blood analysis offers clues to the identity of a serial killer.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blood WorkWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like Blood Work · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles
Blood Work
In the Line of Fire