BloodRayne vs Dracula in Istanbul
Dracula in Istanbul has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 4.2/10 for BloodRayne). BloodRayne is the shorter watch at 1h 35m compared with 1h 42m. Dracula in Istanbul is the older of the two (1953 against 2005). Both are fantasy, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
BloodRayne
Dracula in Istanbul| BloodRayne | Dracula in Istanbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.2/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2005 | 1953 |
| Length | 1h 35m | 1h 42m |
| Genres | Fantasy, Horror | Fantasy, Horror |
| Country | Germany | Turkey |
| Director | Uwe Boll | Mehmet Muhtar |
| Main cast | Matthew Davis, Michael Paré, Udo Kier, Michael Madsen, Ben Kingsley | Atıf Kaptan, Annie Ball, Cahit Irgat, Ayfer Feray, Bülent Oran |
Synopsis
BloodRayne
In 18th-century Romania, after spending much of her life in a traveling circus, human-vampire hybrid Rayne escapes and plots to take down her father, Kagan, the evil vampire king. When she's discovered by three vampire hunters, she manages to convince them to spare her life and join her cause. But slaying a vampire as powerful as Kagan will be no easy task.
Dracula in Istanbul
Azmi has taken on the role of lawyer for a count named Dracula living in Romania. Dracula is a vampire descended from Vlad the Impaler and wants to buy many houses in Istanbul through Azmi. When Azmi learned that Dracula was actually a vampire, the count had already set off for Istanbul.
Where to watch
Where to watch BloodRayneWhere to watch Dracula in Istanbul
More like BloodRayne · More like Dracula in Istanbul · Compare other titles