Bloodsport vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 7/10 for Bloodsport). Bloodsport is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 26m. Bloodsport is the older of the two (1988 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Bloodsport
Man on Fire| Bloodsport | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1988 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Newt Arnold | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Forest Whitaker, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Philip Chan, Paulo Tocha, Norman Burton | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Bloodsport
An American Army Major goes AWOL to Hong Kong for an outlawed martial arts contest called the Kumite.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch BloodsportWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Bloodsport · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles