Blue Moon vs On a String
Blue Moon has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 7.3/10 for On a String). On a String is the shorter watch at 1h 18m compared with 1h 40m. Both are comedy, drama, music movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Blue Moon | On a String | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Length | 1h 40m | 1h 18m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, History, Music, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Music |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Richard Linklater | Isabel Hagen |
| Main cast | Ethan Hawke, Patrick Kennedy, Andrew Scott, Andrew Bennett, David Rawle | Eric Bogosian, Dylan Baker, Frederick Weller, Charlie Ray, Jamie Lee |
Synopsis
Blue Moon
On the evening of March 31, 1943, legendary lyricist Lorenz Hart confronts his shattered self-confidence in Sardi’s bar as his former collaborator Richard Rodgers celebrates the opening night of his ground-breaking hit musical “Oklahoma!”.
On a String
A young, Juilliard-trained violist is still living at home with her parents in the heart of NYC, while trying to make a living playing gigs with her friends in the homes of strangers.
Where to watch
Where to watch Blue MoonWhere to watch On a String
More like Blue Moon · More like On a String · Compare other titles
Blue Moon
On a String