Blue Moon vs Taking Woodstock
Blue Moon has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.2/10 for Taking Woodstock). Blue Moon is the shorter watch at 1h 40m compared with 2h . Taking Woodstock is the older of the two (2009 against 2025). Both are comedy, drama, music movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Blue Moon
Taking Woodstock| Blue Moon | Taking Woodstock | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 40m | 2h |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, History, Music, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Music |
| Country | Ireland | – |
| Director | Richard Linklater | Ang Lee |
| Main cast | Ethan Hawke, Patrick Kennedy, Andrew Scott, Andrew Bennett, David Rawle | Jonathan Groff, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Paul Dano, Liev Schreiber, Imelda Staunton |
Synopsis
Blue Moon
On the evening of March 31, 1943, legendary lyricist Lorenz Hart confronts his shattered self-confidence in Sardi’s bar as his former collaborator Richard Rodgers celebrates the opening night of his ground-breaking hit musical “Oklahoma!”.
Taking Woodstock
The story of Elliot Tiber and his family, who inadvertently played a pivotal role in making the famed Woodstock Music and Arts Festival into the happening that it was. When Elliot hears that a neighboring town has pulled the permit on a hippie music festival, he calls the producers thinking he could drum up some much-needed business for his parents' run-down motel. Three weeks later, half a million people are on their way to his neighbor’s farm…
Where to watch
Where to watch Blue MoonWhere to watch Taking Woodstock
More like Blue Moon · More like Taking Woodstock · Compare other titles