Books of Blood vs Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.3/10 for Books of Blood). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 47m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2020). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Books of Blood
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars| Books of Blood | Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2020 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 47m | 1h 2m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Brannon Braga | Graeme Harper |
| Main cast | Andy McQueen, Nicholas Campbell, Freda Foh Shen, Britt Robertson, Yul Vazquez | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster |
Synopsis
Books of Blood
A journey into uncharted and forbidden territory through three tales tangled in space and time.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Where to watch
Where to watch Books of BloodWhere to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
More like Books of Blood · More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · Compare other titles