Bound by Honor vs Man on Fire
Bound by Honor has the higher audience score (8.1/10 against 7.5/10 for Man on Fire). Man on Fire is the shorter watch at 2h 26m compared with 3h . Bound by Honor is the older of the two (1993 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Bound by Honor
Man on Fire| Bound by Honor | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.1/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 2004 |
| Length | 3h | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Taylor Hackford | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Billy Bob Thornton, Valente Rodriguez, Benjamin Bratt, Delroy Lindo, Lanny Flaherty | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Bound by Honor
Based on the true life experiences of poet Jimmy Santiago Baca, the film focuses on half-brothers Paco and Cruz, and their bi-racial cousin Miklo. It opens in 1972, as the three are members of an East L.A. gang known as the "Vatos Locos", and the story focuses on how a violent crime and the influence of narcotics alter their lives. Miklo is incarcerated and sent to San Quentin, where he makes a "home" for himself. Cruz becomes an exceptional…
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Bound by HonorWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Bound by Honor · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles