Bowling for Columbine vs GoodFellas
GoodFellas has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 7.5/10 for Bowling for Columbine). Bowling for Columbine is the shorter watch at 2h compared with 2h 25m. GoodFellas is the older of the two (1990 against 2002). Both are crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Bowling for Columbine
GoodFellas| Bowling for Columbine | GoodFellas | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 1990 |
| Length | 2h | 2h 25m |
| Genres | Crime, Documentary, Drama | Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Michael Moore | Martin Scorsese |
| Main cast | Michael Moore, Charlton Heston, Dick Clark, George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush | Ray Liotta, Robert De Niro, Frank Vincent, Tony Darrow, Lorraine Bracco |
Synopsis
Bowling for Columbine
This is not a film about gun control. It is a film about the fearful heart and soul of the United States, and the 280 million Americans lucky enough to have the right to a constitutionally protected Uzi. From a look at the Columbine High School security camera tapes to the home of Oscar-winning NRA President Charlton Heston, from a young man who makes homemade napalm with The Anarchist's Cookbook to the murder of a six-year-old girl by another…
GoodFellas
The true story of Henry Hill, a half-Irish, half-Sicilian Brooklyn kid who is adopted by neighbourhood gangsters at an early age and climbs the ranks of a Mafia family under the guidance of Jimmy Conway.
Where to watch
Where to watch Bowling for ColumbineWhere to watch GoodFellas
More like Bowling for Columbine · More like GoodFellas · Compare other titles