Braveheart vs Fate of a Man
Braveheart has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.6/10 for Fate of a Man). Fate of a Man is the shorter watch at 1h 43m compared with 2h 57m. Fate of a Man is the older of the two (1959 against 1995). Both are drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Braveheart | Fate of a Man | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 7.6/10 |
| Year | 1995 | 1959 |
| Length | 2h 57m | 1h 43m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, History, War | Drama, War |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Mel Gibson | Sergey Bondarchuk |
| Main cast | Mel Gibson, Brendan Gleeson, Catherine McCormack, Sean McGinley, Sophie Marceau | Aleksandr Kuznetsov, Sergey Bondarchuk, Pavel Boriskin, Zinaida Kirienko, Pavel Volkov |
Synopsis
Braveheart
Enraged at the slaughter of Murron, his new bride and childhood love, Scottish warrior William Wallace slays a platoon of the local English lord's soldiers. This leads the village to revolt and, eventually, the entire country to rise up against English rule.
Fate of a Man
The story of a man whose life was ruthlessly crippled by World War II. His wife and daughters were killed during the bombing of his village, he spent some time as a prisoner, and his only son was killed in action only a few days before the victory...
Where to watch
Where to watch BraveheartWhere to watch Fate of a Man
More like Braveheart · More like Fate of a Man · Compare other titles
Braveheart
Fate of a Man