Braveheart vs King Arthur
Braveheart has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.3/10 for King Arthur). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 57m. Braveheart is the older of the two (1995 against 2004). Both are action, drama, history movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Braveheart
King Arthur| Braveheart | King Arthur | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 1995 | 2004 |
| Length | 2h 57m | 2h 6m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, History, War | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Mel Gibson | Antoine Fuqua |
| Main cast | Mel Gibson, Brendan Gleeson, Catherine McCormack, Sean McGinley, Sophie Marceau | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy |
Synopsis
Braveheart
Enraged at the slaughter of Murron, his new bride and childhood love, Scottish warrior William Wallace slays a platoon of the local English lord's soldiers. This leads the village to revolt and, eventually, the entire country to rise up against English rule.
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Where to watch
Where to watch BraveheartWhere to watch King Arthur
More like Braveheart · More like King Arthur · Compare other titles