Bridget Jones's Baby vs Princes and Princesses

Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.4/10 for Bridget Jones's Baby). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 2h 3m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Bridget Jones's Baby posterBridget Jones's Baby2016 VS Princes and Princesses posterPrinces and Princesses2000
Bridget Jones's BabyPrinces and Princesses
Audience score★ 6.4/10★ 7.7/10
Year20162000
Length2h 3m1h 10m
GenresComedy, Drama, RomanceAdventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance
CountryFranceFrance
DirectorSharon MaguireMichel Ocelot
Main castJames Callis, Patrick Dempsey, Jessica Hynes, Julian Rhind-Tutt, Renée ZellwegerYves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin

Synopsis

Bridget Jones's Baby

After breaking up with Mark Darcy five years earlier, Bridget Jones' happily-ever-after hasn't quite gone according to plan. Fortysomething and single again, she decides to focus on her job as top news producer and surround herself with old friends and new. For once, Bridget has everything completely under control. Then her love life takes a turn - while a weekend away at a music festival, she meets a dashing American named Jack, who is…

Princes and Princesses

In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.

Where to watch

Where to watch Bridget Jones's BabyWhere to watch Princes and Princesses

More like Bridget Jones's Baby · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles