Brimstone vs No Country for Old Men
No Country for Old Men has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.1/10 for Brimstone). No Country for Old Men is the shorter watch at 2h 2m compared with 2h 28m. No Country for Old Men is the older of the two (2007 against 2016). Both are thriller, western movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Brimstone
No Country for Old Men| Brimstone | No Country for Old Men | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.1/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2007 |
| Length | 2h 28m | 2h 2m |
| Genres | Thriller, Western | Crime, Thriller, Western |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Martin Koolhoven | Ethan Coen, Joel Coen |
| Main cast | Kit Harington, Paul Anderson, Dakota Fanning, Emilia Jones, Guy Pearce | Kelly Macdonald, Josh Brolin, Stephen Root, Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem |
Synopsis
Brimstone
In the menacing inferno of the old North-American West, Liz is a genuine survivor who is hunted by a vengeful preacher for a crime she didn’t commit.
No Country for Old Men
Llewelyn Moss stumbles upon dead bodies, $2 million and a hoard of heroin in a Texas desert, but methodical killer Anton Chigurh comes looking for it, with local sheriff Ed Tom Bell hot on his trail. The roles of prey and predator blur as the violent pursuit of money and justice collide.
Where to watch
Where to watch BrimstoneWhere to watch No Country for Old Men
More like Brimstone · More like No Country for Old Men · Compare other titles