Bunraku vs Man on Fire

Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for Bunraku). Bunraku is the shorter watch at 2h 4m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Bunraku posterBunraku2010 VS Man on Fire posterMan on Fire2004
BunrakuMan on Fire
Audience score★ 5.8/10★ 7.5/10
Year20102004
Length2h 4m2h 26m
GenresAction, Drama, ThrillerAction, Drama, Thriller
Country––
DirectorGuy MosheTony Scott
Main castKevin McKidd, Josh Hartnett, Ron Perlman, Demi Moore, Fernando ChienDakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke

Synopsis

Bunraku

In a world with no guns, a mysterious drifter, a bartender and a young samurai plot revenge against a ruthless leader and his army of thugs, headed by nine diverse and deadly assassins.

Man on Fire

Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.

Where to watch

Where to watch BunrakuWhere to watch Man on Fire

More like Bunraku · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles