Burnt Money vs Soft Shoes
Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.8/10 for Burnt Money). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 2h 5m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 2000). Both are crime, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Burnt Money | Soft Shoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 1925 |
| Length | 2h 5m | 46m |
| Genres | Crime, Romance | Comedy, Crime, Romance, Western |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Marcelo Piñeyro | Lloyd Ingraham |
| Main cast | Eduardo Noriega, Leonardo Sbaraglia, Pablo Echarri, Leticia Brédice, Ricardo Bartis | James Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich |
Synopsis
Burnt Money
Set in Argentina in 1965, the story follows the tumultuous relationship between two men who became lovers and ultimately ruthless bank robbers in a notoriously famous footnote in the annals of crime history. After a large-scale hold-up that turns bloody, the two men must flee. It is not long before the police are surrounding the building they are in and they must confront their demons to survive.
Soft Shoes
Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…
Where to watch
Where to watch Burnt MoneyWhere to watch Soft Shoes
More like Burnt Money · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles
Burnt Money
Soft Shoes