Casino Royale vs Slow Burn
Casino Royale has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 4.5/10 for Slow Burn). Slow Burn is the shorter watch at 1h 37m compared with 2h 24m. Slow Burn is the older of the two (2000 against 2006). Both are adventure, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Casino Royale
Slow Burn| Casino Royale | Slow Burn | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 4.5/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2000 |
| Length | 2h 24m | 1h 37m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Thriller | Adventure, Thriller |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Martin Campbell | Christian Ford |
| Main cast | Tobias Menzies, Jeffrey Wright, Mads Mikkelsen, Eva Green, Judi Dench | James Spader, Josh Brolin, Minnie Driver, Stuart Wilson, Jennifer Ann Evans |
Synopsis
Casino Royale
Le Chiffre, a banker to the world's terrorists, is scheduled to participate in a high-stakes poker game in Montenegro, where he intends to use his winnings to establish his financial grip on the terrorist market. M sends Bond—on his maiden mission as a 00 Agent—to attend this game and prevent Le Chiffre from winning. With the help of Vesper Lynd and Felix Leiter, Bond enters the most important poker game in his already dangerous career.
Slow Burn
A woman's lifelong pursuit of lost family diamonds is interrupted by the appearance of two escaped convicts.
Where to watch
Where to watch Casino RoyaleWhere to watch Slow Burn
More like Casino Royale · More like Slow Burn · Compare other titles