Castaway on the Moon vs Trace of Stones

Castaway on the Moon has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). Castaway on the Moon is the shorter watch at 1h 59m compared with 2h 19m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 2009). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Castaway on the Moon posterCastaway on the Moon2009 VS Trace of Stones posterTrace of Stones1966
Castaway on the MoonTrace of Stones
Audience score★ 7.9/10★ 6.1/10
Year20091966
Length1h 59m2h 19m
GenresComedy, Drama, RomanceComedy, Drama, Romance
Country––
DirectorLee Hae-junFrank Beyer
Main castKoo Kyo-hwan, Jung Jae-young, Jang So-yeon, Park Young-seo, Jung Ryeo-wonHans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke

Synopsis

Castaway on the Moon

Mr. Kim is jobless, lost in debt and has been dumped by his girlfriend. He decides to end it all by jumping into the Han River - only to find himself washed up on a small, mid-river island. He soon abandons thoughts of suicide or rescue and begins a new life as a castaway. His antics catch the attention of a young woman whose apartment overlooks the river. Her discovery changes both their lives.

Trace of Stones

Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…

Where to watch

Where to watch Castaway on the MoonWhere to watch Trace of Stones

More like Castaway on the Moon · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles