Cellular vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.4/10 for Cellular). Cellular is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 1h 36m. Cellular is the older of the two (2004 against 2010). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Cellular
Undisputed III: Redemption| Cellular | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.4/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | David R. Ellis | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Eric Christian Olsen, William H. Macy, Rick Hoffman, Noah Emmerich, Chris Evans | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Cellular
A young man receives an emergency phone call on his cell phone from an older woman. She claims to have been kidnapped – and the kidnappers have targeted her husband and child next.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch CellularWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Cellular · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles