Charlie Countryman vs Fanaa
Fanaa has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6.4/10 for Charlie Countryman). Charlie Countryman is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 2h 48m. Fanaa is the older of the two (2006 against 2013). Both are action, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Charlie Countryman
Fanaa| Charlie Countryman | Fanaa | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.4/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 2006 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 2h 48m |
| Genres | Action, Comedy, Drama, Romance, Thriller | Action, Drama, Romance, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Fredrik Bond | Kunal Kohli |
| Main cast | Aubrey Plaza, Mads Mikkelsen, Evan Rachel Wood, Vincent D'Onofrio, Rupert Grint | Gautami Kapoor, Satish Shah, Vrajesh Hirjee, Tabu, Jaspal Bhatti |
Synopsis
Charlie Countryman
While traveling abroad, a guy falls for a Romanian beauty whose unreachable heart has its origins in her violent, charismatic ex.
Fanaa
Zooni Ali Beg is a blind Kashmiri girl who travels without her parents for the first time with a dance troupe to Delhi to perform in a ceremony for independence day. On her journey, she meets Rehan Khan, a casanova and tour guide who flirts with her. Although her friends warn Zooni about him, she cannot resist falling in love with him and he takes her on a private tour of New Delhi. But there is more to Rehan than meets the eye and Zooni will…
Where to watch
Where to watch Charlie CountrymanWhere to watch Fanaa
More like Charlie Countryman · More like Fanaa · Compare other titles