Cheaper by the Dozen vs Princes and Princesses
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.3/10 for Cheaper by the Dozen). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 38m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2003). Both are comedy, drama, family movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Cheaper by the Dozen | Princes and Princesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 38m | 1h 10m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Family | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Shawn Levy | Michel Ocelot |
| Main cast | Tom Welling, Steve Martin, Alyson Stoner, Piper Perabo, Bonnie Hunt | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin |
Synopsis
Cheaper by the Dozen
The Baker brood moves to Chicago after patriarch Tom gets a job coaching football at Northwestern University, forcing his writer wife, Kate, and the couple's 12 children to make a major adjustment. The transition works well until work demands pull the parents away from home, leaving the kids bored -- and increasingly mischievous.
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where to watch
Where to watch Cheaper by the DozenWhere to watch Princes and Princesses
More like Cheaper by the Dozen · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles
Cheaper by the Dozen
Princes and Princesses