Chicago vs To Die For
Chicago has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 1h 53m. To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2002). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Chicago
To Die For| Chicago | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.1/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Rob Marshall | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Dominic West, Richard Gere, Christine Baranski, Colm Feore, Lucy Liu | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
Chicago
Murderesses Velma Kelly and Roxie Hart find themselves on death row together and fight for the fame that will keep them from the gallows in 1920s Chicago.
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch ChicagoWhere to watch To Die For
More like Chicago · More like To Die For · Compare other titles