Children of Men vs In Hell
Children of Men has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 6.5/10 for In Hell). In Hell is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 49m. In Hell is the older of the two (2003 against 2006). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Children of Men | In Hell | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 49m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Alfonso Cuarón | Ringo Lam Ling-Tung |
| Main cast | Peter Mullan, Charlie Hunnam, Clive Owen, Michael Caine, Danny Huston | Michael Bailey Smith, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Carlos Gómez, Robert LaSardo, Billy Rieck |
Synopsis
Children of Men
In 2027, in a chaotic world in which humans can no longer procreate, a former activist agrees to help transport a miraculously pregnant woman to a sanctuary at sea, where her child's birth may help scientists save the future of humankind.
In Hell
A man must survive a prison where hardened criminals battle to the death for the warden's entertainment.
Where to watch
Where to watch Children of MenWhere to watch In Hell
More like Children of Men · More like In Hell · Compare other titles
Children of Men
In Hell