Children of Men vs Man on Fire
Children of Men and Man on Fire are tied on audience score (7.6/10). Children of Men is the shorter watch at 1h 49m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2006). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Children of Men
Man on Fire| Children of Men | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 49m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Alfonso Cuarón | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Peter Mullan, Charlie Hunnam, Clive Owen, Michael Caine, Danny Huston | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Children of Men
In 2027, in a chaotic world in which humans can no longer procreate, a former activist agrees to help transport a miraculously pregnant woman to a sanctuary at sea, where her child's birth may help scientists save the future of humankind.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Children of MenWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Children of Men · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles