Children of Men vs The Sum of All Fears
Children of Men has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 6.4/10 for The Sum of All Fears). Children of Men is the shorter watch at 1h 49m compared with 2h 4m. The Sum of All Fears is the older of the two (2002 against 2006). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Children of Men
The Sum of All Fears| Children of Men | The Sum of All Fears | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.6/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 49m | 2h 4m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Alfonso Cuarón | Phil Alden Robinson |
| Main cast | Peter Mullan, Charlie Hunnam, Clive Owen, Michael Caine, Danny Huston | Ron Rifkin, Bridget Moynahan, Liev Schreiber, Colm Feore, Ben Affleck |
Synopsis
Children of Men
In 2027, in a chaotic world in which humans can no longer procreate, a former activist agrees to help transport a miraculously pregnant woman to a sanctuary at sea, where her child's birth may help scientists save the future of humankind.
The Sum of All Fears
When the president of Russia suddenly dies, a man whose politics are virtually unknown succeeds him. The change in political leaders sparks paranoia among American CIA officials, so CIA director Bill Cabot recruits a young analyst to supply insight and advice on the situation. Then the unthinkable happens: a nuclear bomb explodes in a U.S. city, and America is quick to blame the Russians.
Where to watch
Where to watch Children of MenWhere to watch The Sum of All Fears
More like Children of Men · More like The Sum of All Fears · Compare other titles