City Slickers vs Soft Shoes
Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.4/10 for City Slickers). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 1h 54m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 1991). Both are comedy, western movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| City Slickers | Soft Shoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.4/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1991 | 1925 |
| Length | 1h 54m | 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Western | Comedy, Crime, Romance, Western |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ron Underwood | Lloyd Ingraham |
| Main cast | Jake Gyllenhaal, Billy Crystal, Daniel Stern, Tracey Walter, Jeffrey Tambor | James Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich |
Synopsis
City Slickers
Three New York businessmen decide to take a "Wild West" vacation that turns out not to be the relaxing vacation they had envisioned.
Soft Shoes
Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…
Where to watch
Where to watch City SlickersWhere to watch Soft Shoes
More like City Slickers · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles
City Slickers
Soft Shoes