City Slickers vs Soft Shoes

Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.4/10 for City Slickers). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 1h 54m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 1991). Both are comedy, western movies, so they suit a similar mood.

City Slickers posterCity Slickers1991 VS Soft Shoes posterSoft Shoes1925
City SlickersSoft Shoes
Audience score★ 6.4/10★ 7.5/10
Year19911925
Length1h 54m46m
GenresComedy, WesternComedy, Crime, Romance, Western
Country––
DirectorRon UnderwoodLloyd Ingraham
Main castJake Gyllenhaal, Billy Crystal, Daniel Stern, Tracey Walter, Jeffrey TamborJames Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich

Synopsis

City Slickers

Three New York businessmen decide to take a "Wild West" vacation that turns out not to be the relaxing vacation they had envisioned.

Soft Shoes

Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…

Where to watch

Where to watch City SlickersWhere to watch Soft Shoes

More like City Slickers · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles