Clear and Present Danger vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.7/10 for Clear and Present Danger). Clear and Present Danger is the shorter watch at 2h 21m compared with 2h 26m. Clear and Present Danger is the older of the two (1994 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Clear and Present Danger
Man on Fire| Clear and Present Danger | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.7/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1994 | 2004 |
| Length | 2h 21m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Phillip Noyce | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Harrison Ford, Henry Czerny, Miguel Sandoval, Benjamin Bratt, Willem Dafoe | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Clear and Present Danger
Agent Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence for the CIA when Admiral Greer is diagnosed with cancer. When an American businessman, and friend of the president, is murdered on his yacht, Ryan starts discovering links between the man and drug dealers. As former CIA agent John Clark is sent to Colombia to kill drug cartel kingpins in retaliation, Ryan must fight through multiple cover-ups to figure out what happened and who's…
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Clear and Present DangerWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Clear and Present Danger · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles